| d2r diego's weblog |
the cinematic roots of The MatrixI was thinking about this as I went to see Matrix Reloaded and then again after I saw it, as I wrote my comments on it. My view of the special effects in Reloaded in particular changed since I wrote that review, when I remembered something that I had forgotten: that The Matrix is, at its core, Live Anime. I got carried away by the "hollywoodish action" feeling of The Matrix; when the first movie came out in 1999 not many expected it to be the massive hit it was. But it was a hit, and the rules changed: whatever the Wachowski brothers had planned for the series now also had to match the expectations of people regarding hit movies, something they probably didn't want to do (if you want to see how "mainstream" the brothers are, watch their previous movie, Bound). Unless you're James Cameron or Steven Spielberg, who seem to have the pulse on superhit audience expectations, it's probably better to stick to your guns, which seems to be what the brothers did in Reloaded. Things are perceived differently when you apply different expectations to them, that's not a surprise. My feelings towards the visual/cinematic style of Reloaded had been shifting since I saw the movie. In the end, I think most of the problems of the movie can be traced to apparent timing problems, some scenes that are too long, etc, which might have more to do with Reloaded and Revolutions being shot as one movie and then split in half, rather than as two. I've read that the Wachowski wanted to release Revolutions only a month after Reloaded but the studio would have none of it. That would probably have made a lot more sense, and maybe take the edge off all the unresolved threads in the second movie. By the way, if I appear to be obsessive about this, it's because I am. :) Not about The Matrix in particular, but about storytelling in general, particularly for SF movies, which are the hardest to get right; the analysis I did of Minority Report in July last year comes to mind.
Ghost in the shell has so much imagery that echoes in The Matrix as well that it's difficult to know where to start comparing. From people with plugs all over their bodies back into a computer system (I know this is a common science fiction theme, but in the aesthetics are remarkably similar), to sentient software run amok in the real and virtual world, the connections are pervasive. There are other parallels, not just with Anime but with Manga (Japanese print comics) and comic books in general as well (Trinity's attire keeps reminding me of Catwoman, for example), which are much more complex in terms of story than people generally think (witness the richness of the story of the X-Men series of movies, which is basically watered-down content from the comic book stories). Anyway, in the end what I mean is that put in the right context, The Matrix series is even better than in looks in close inspection. And, if Revolutions follows closely the tradition of Anime, we should prepare ourselves for an ending that might be ambiguous, even possibly unsatisfying by Hollywood's standards, as it would be if for example it was revealed that Neo was a piece of software, just like the Agents are (as I've mentioned before). Already Reloaded makes you feel a bit stupid because everything that you thought was true isn't, which I'm sure adds to the feeling of unease towards the movie. If the Wachowski brothers haven't bowed down to pressure (from the studio, the audiences, and so on) they will at least deliver a consistent vision of their own, and that's what art is about. They already have enough money to not have to care about box office receipts. Now they only have to show that they can break out of Hollywood's own crap-producing money-grabbing sequel cycle. Categories: art.mediaPosted by diego on May 25 2003 at 2:33 PM Comments (please see the comments & trackback policy).
Great comments. The over-action didn't sit well with me as I looked at it yesterday either. But, it does follow the action anime style very well. I think you're right that most people and Hollywood in particular may not be satisfied with the ending. I added some comments to your review post. I think Neo and Morpheus may be human clone style agents. I think we may be in for a surprise answer to the question "What is the Matrix?" from the first film. The Wachowski brothers may be playing with the theme from the Borges short story wherein Judas is actually the good apostle. The people trying to get back in the matrix may be the ones on the right track. The agents trying to keep everyone settled in may be the maintainers of the best solution for mankind. The symbiotic relationship could be the only course for survival open to man. Let me know what you think about the plot possibilities in the other thread. For me, the plot and story telling are the big draw for films, particularly sci-fi as you mentioned. Posted by: doug powell at May 25, 2003 10:56 PMSorry about the double posting. I don't know why that happened. I just made some minor edits in the second one. I didn't think the first one went through. Operator error I guess. doug Posted by: doug powell at May 25, 2003 10:59 PMDoug, no problem. I deleted the extra posting. Your reference to the Borges story is interesting, I hadn't thought about that but it's definitely a possibility. Regarding the possibility that the Matrix is actually benign, I agree. It is possible; for example in Animatrix (as I mentioned in the review) we get to see that the machines are trying to make peace with humans, who keep on fighting. The suspense is killing me! I'll have to think about something else for a while. Forget that The Matrix ever existed... until November :) Posted by: Diego at May 26, 2003 12:29 AMCopyright © Diego Doval 2002-2007.
|

