| d2r diego's weblog: January 3, 2005 Archives |
in the bay area this thursday!I'm going to be traveling to the SF Bay Area this Thursday for a few days (I'll be there until early next week). I'm going to, um, interview with a certain company :), but that aside, I'm traveling with a bit of slack to actually spend some time with people. I'm really looking forward to it. And no, not only because I expect the weather to be much better than Dublin. :) PS: who else will be there around that time? Let me know, I'll try to make time at least for a coffee and a chat. new designI have succumbed to the temptation! Yes! A few weeks ago I spent some time playing around with new designs, but none of them really convinced me. I was looking at them again this morning, though, and I realized that one of them wasn't too bad, and it could be a good starting point, considering also that the previous design was nearly a year old. So here it is... let's see how it works out. I still have some pages to update, particularly for the individual entries. The new design is not that different really, mostly it reduces clutter and organizes things a bit (and gets rid of time-dependent elements in individual entries). One "feature" I like about it is that while it uses CSS, there is some structure maintained through tables (which the CSS kinda overrides). Purists will probably scoff at this, but I did it to maintain the design parameters when looking at the site with the venerable Lynx and older browsers. Lynx-compatibility is a crucial feature! Heh. PS: you might need to do a hard-refresh in your browser to reload the CSS. Let me know if you see problems in a particular platform. Thanks! Later: Holy Cow! Now that each individual page doesn't include links to archives and such, the rebuild process is about two orders of magnitude faster. It's now rebuilding some 20 pages per second, whereas before it used to take 5 seconds per page (Rebuild of a single entry on its own takes longer because it also rebuilds all associated indexes, but it's also much faster!). I've just rebuilt the entire site in like 4 minutes! That was all I had to do to get it to run faster? This makes me think that maybe the default entry/daily/archive templates for MT should not include so many dynamically generated links. Another lesson there somewhere... my dream portable for 2005![]() Okay, since I'm tired of waiting for someone at some PC manufacturer to come up with what I really want, and since they don't appear to have developed mind-reading yet, I thought I'd spec it out here, including some quick sketches :) (click on the images to see a larger version). I often think about what I'd really like in a portable and surprisingly my thoughts have been pretty consistent of late. Before you start saying that this already exists, read through the specs--the devil is in the details! The basics To start, I don't want anything that doesn't exist today. It's all a matter of packaging and connectivity. Fairly obvious things that my dream portable should have are:
So far I imagine few people would disagree with me, except maybe on the size of the built-in disk. Ah, but here's where what I want differs from what's out there. I separate between base storage and personal storage. Let me explain. The Key: Storage Base Storage is what's required to run the OS and applications. It's not your data, it's something that is machine-dependent (mostly) and relatively stable. For this, 40 gigabytes is pretty good for today's needs. Personal Storage is for my data. These days, when we're running around with tens of gigabytes of MP3s, videos, and such, not to mention the rest of the stuff (my personal data store, not including media, is about 4 gigs), we need a lot more than what portables require, additionally, synchronization between our devices is a nightmare. Data ends up duplicated for no reason. So what I think is that we should decouple our storage from everything else, and that's where things get interesting. This personal storage device would be reasonably big, 250 gigabytes minimum, maybe reaching into a terabyte by the end of the year on single platter drives (on multiple 3.5 inch platters we're probably there by now). Yes, I know that the idea of "Brick PCs" has been floated in the past, but I don't want a PC on a brick. I just want a drive on a brick. More on the 'Storage Brick' So were does the personal storage go in my dream laptop? Look at the back view: The personal storage unit "docks" into the back. That is, instead of docking the machine into an expansion unit, just dock the drive into the machine! This approach has several advantages. First, I should be able to selectively synchronize some important data into the permanent storage of the portable, for when portability is more important and I don't want to carry the storage brick around. Second, I should be able to dock the storage into my desktop PC, making it easy to move between machines. Third, using the PC's larger internal storage to automatically sync (i.e., backup) my personal storage brick with the local drive we'd get automatic backups! Yay! :) Also, by splitting up the machine into more parts, you get more choice in portability. Need to minimize weight? Just take the screen and base unit and use it in tablet mode. Need more space? Plug in the brick. Easy. What's crucial here is not the idea of portable drives, but the simplicity of "docking the drive" into the portable and into the desktop PC. Alternatively, instead of docking you could do a USB2 or FireWire connection, and handle the integration in software. If we lived in a perfect world, we should be able to just buy a storage brick from one manufacturer, the base from another, the keyboard from someone else... but that's for later. All the technology required for this already exists. All that's required is the integration work, and, yes, the sync software for the drive dock would be a sticky point, but certainly nothing insurmountable. Some day... meeting martinSo yesterday evening while I was waiting for tech support to reply and in the midst of work I took a break and went up to the Gravity Bar, in the Guinness Storehouse (part of the tour thingy), and met fellow mobitopian Martin and his girlfriend for a drink. (Interestingly enough, I was supposed to pay for entering, a tiny fact I remembered after I got there, but I must have walked in with such determination that they let go by even as they stopped other people to ask for "tickets"). Anyway, we had a good chat and it went by pretty fast. We were there for about an hour, and it seemed like a few minutes! Excellent. :) mini-outageYesterday I had a strange outage on the site, connection started to get really slow until it was impossible to connect. Ping was reporting 85 percent packet loss. And so on. I tried a few things, stopping and starting services, to no avail (nothing seemed to be wrong *in* the machine). In the end I just contacted tech support at my hosting company and in a couple of hours they figured it out (all the signs pointed to some problem just "before" my machine). Then I spent some time last night restarting the stuff I had stopped and checking nothing bad had happened. Now it's all back to normal. "Or as normal as it gets..." :) Copyright © Diego Doval 2002-2007.
|

